Give this a quick read: it won't take long. It's about Google barging into Finland, whacking down trees, and clearing over 800 acres of land without bothering to get a legal environmental assessment. It says in the article that a criminal investigation has been launched. Google's reaction to that? "Whoops! Well we can't put the nature back now, how much will it cost," knowing the answer to that won't require them to access funds beyond their little petty cash account. What were they clearing the land for? What else? A data centre.
So why should drainage and water mismanagement, deforestation, and careless habitat destruction in Finland concern you and me? The natural destruction SHOULD concern us all, but I'm going to forego that angle and concentrate on one that has figured more largely in my latest posts. The explosion of data centres around the world is an AI-driven phenomenon and it affects us all directly. The important part of the article is the end. 93,000 people have signed a petition demanding more data centre regulation because they don't help regular people. Who do they help? What are the odds of getting any action from that petition? The answer to one of those questions will answer the other. They help big business and since that is precisely the mandate of modern government no matter what country or pretense of democracy they provide for the people of that country, that petition might as well go where all the trees went. Big business gets what big business wants. Although, Finland might be one of the only countries where that petition has a ghost of a chance. I'll probably receive no closure on this from the media though so let's continue...
The crux of this post lies in the way that these data centers are designed to help big business. If I asked you what the most valuable commodity in the world was, you'd probably give me something that WAS once the most valuable like oil, gold, or beaver pelts. (A little Canadian joke there) But in the digital economy that has been thrust upon the world, there is no doubt that data is the new gold/oil/beaver pelts. Why is data so valuable? For one thing it doesn't get used up like oil. It can be (Try to buy something without being asked to sign up for a membership, download an app, join a club, or just flat out give them your phone number, address, postal code, whatever.) and IS shared. But most importantly it can be used to predict behaviour and, theoretically, He who can predict the world's behaviour rules the world.
Surely there must be SOME benefit to us! Shouldn't internet speeds increase or phone data service get better? Theoretically both should be yes. Has anybody reading this noticed any improvement? I was at work this past Sunday checking the football scores to see how far behind in the football pool I was. At one point I was 40th out of 40! YAY for me! There was a ship in the slip and it's part of my job to be out on the dock watching and recording the ships' entrances and exits from our port. The importance of the job is definitely increased due to our proximity to the US and higher chance of illegal immigration. A decent swimmer could swim from the end of our dock to the US no problem. Where I stand to watch ships leave is probably the closest to the US a guy can get around here. But never - until Sunday - had my data provider (which I have overexplained is one of the Triumvirate of Evil in Canadian telecom) thought I was in the United States. After the ship cleared the dock I went back to the guard shack and turned on my phone to check the progress of the football games. It was like I had no service at all! The only thing I had was a message from Fido saying, "Welcome to the United States. You have Fido roaming for $16 a day (probably US dollars). Enjoy your travels!" And I got a prompt to accept roaming charges. Otherwise, my phone was a brick pretty much. Strangely, as I walked home after my shift was finished, alerts from missed messages started sounding, functions started returning, and by the time I was home my phone was back to normal again. So the data center explosion hasn't helped ME that I've noticed.
But has it hurt me? This is where conspiracy theorist Uncle Dave straps on his tinfoil hat. You may have read the post where I verified the oft-suspected fact that my government had flagged me. You may have also read the recent post about how the Chinese social credit system may not be so different from what Canada has. I used the word "flagging" for Canada. In China the word "blacklisting" is used. My question is does Canada flag or blacklist? Before you think I'm alone in this, please read this article. It's from 6 years ago folks. A LOT has happened in those 6 years too! One thing is their link to the CTV story about social credit blacklisting has been blocked. I found this one but I don't know if it's the right one. Read the story about Li Xiaolin the lawyer that tried to buy a plane ticket cuz he was 1900 miles from home. A message came up that he'd been blacklisted. Weeks later (and who knows how much trouble and expense?) he got to the bottom of his blacklisting. Evidently some judge had ordered him years earlier to give someone some sort of apology. The judge blacklisted him, without telling him, because he determined the apology to be insincere. Why? Because it was dated April 1st. The lawyer also tried to get a mortgage but had landed on the mortgage blacklist for the same "offense." Eventually he had to get an association of lawyers to advocate for him and the judge said that if he re-apologize, he'd then be taken off the blacklist.
This very same thing happened to me in China. My employer massively cheated me but got some local judge to force me to sign a paper stating that this employer owed me nothing (which was total bullshit - he owed me a month's wages and plenty of contract-finishing bonus money) or my foreign expert certificate would not be cancelled. At the time I thought it wouldn't be a problem because it was due to expire before my next job started. A very lucrative job I'd probably still have today, or at least I'd have lots of money from today. But that document never got cancelled even after it expired. I couldn't get the job and had to leave China.
So, blacklisting puts WAY too much power into the hands of local judges in China who can fuck people's social credit scores in exchange for money any time they like. Is this happening in Canada? YES! Consider the posts about my credit score here (Give Me Some Credit Will You, Give Me Some Credit Won't You). Telus was like the boss in my Chinese experience, or the people the lawyer was supposed to apologize to in Li Xiaolin's experience. They reported something to an authority with far too much power and that authority blacklisted someone for them EVEN IF THAT REPORT WAS BULLSHIT. I don't know about Li Xiaolin, maybe he SHOULD have apologized, but for SURE I shouldn't have been reported by Telus. The judge in Li's case and Equifax and/or TransUnion lowered our credit scores, blacklisted us, and the dominoes fell. Li couldn't get a mortgage or a plane ticket, I couldn't rent an apartment (and who knows how many other struggles I've had here have been related?).
This is the same thing folks. And it goes far beyond our credit scores. The article says that in Canada we don't have "social credit scores" like China, we have more banal "risk scores" or "risk evaluations." Predictive technology has long since begun "risk assessing" all Canadian citizens with the data we voluntarily provide. The article mainly focuses on renting homes but it impacts people's ability to get jobs, which impacts their ability to rent homes. The question is, will supplanting compassionate human reason with soulless AI data be a good thing? Well, there is a system in Finland that is precisely the opposite and it is achieving good results. There is no doubt homelessness and unemployment are exploding alongside the explosion in data centres and the parallel explosion in AI "risk assessment" being used in our country. Coincidence? I think not.
So, as usual, Scandinavia has figured out what Canada should be doing. If we had any REAL leadership in this country we'd do what Norway has done with their oil industry, what Sweden has done with their law enforcement, and what Finland has done with its education, unemployment, and homelessness. The models are right there for us to imitate. What do you suppose is the reason they are being ignored?
In this article from WAY back in 2016 the Information Sharing Act of Canada is discussed. It represents more than 100 agencies with the abilities to disclose Canadians' personal information to other agencies for the purposes of protection against anything that "undermines the security of Canada." This includes Canada's financial and economic security. What this translates to is if you have a beef against any large corporation, bank, or profitable institute within Canada, even a legitimate one, you could be judged to be undermining the economic security of the country. So by not paying Telus after they blocked me from cancelling their service and charged me for nothing, I was flagged for undermining the security of Canada. This is why government websites don't work for me, this is why I have trouble finding a place to live, and this is why I can't find a good job. Probably. There's really no way of proving any of this. Am I being a conspiracy theorist here? Well this article that is a decade old said we already have the infrastructure for Chinese blacklisting, I don't think it's too big a stretch to assume Canada is using it.
I am sure that the more articles like this I type out, the more extensive my blacklisting becomes. However, you can be sure that as further evidence arises, it will appear right here.








